Striving to protect the Boundary Waters: we’re risking something we can’t replace

As students at St. John’s and St. Ben’s, the Boundary Waters are not some far away issue. They are part of what it means to live and go to school in Minnesota. Whether it is trips with friends, time outdoors or just knowing a place like that exists, it represents something real. That is why the recent approval of mining near the Boundary Waters feels like the wrong decision.

The Boundary Waters are one of the most unique freshwater ecosystems in the country. Everything there is connected. Lakes, rivers, wildlife—all of it depends on clean water. Mining in that kind of environment is not just another development project. It comes with serious risks, especially from sulfide-ore mining, which can create toxic runoff that spreads through water systems. Once that kind of damage happens, it is not easy to fix. In a place like the Boundary Waters, it could be permanent.

Supporters of the decision argue that mining will bring jobs and economic growth. That matters. Northern Minnesota communities deserve opportunity and stability. But this decision feels like trading something long-term for something short-term. The Boundary Waters already support jobs through tourism, outdoor recreation and small businesses that rely on people coming to experience the area. If the water is polluted or the wilderness is damaged, those opportunities do not come back.

From a student perspective, this decision is frustrating because it ignores the bigger picture. We are the generation that is going to live with the consequences of choices like this. We are constantly told to think about sustainability and protecting the environment, yet decisions like this go in the opposite direction. It sends the message that immediate economic gain is more important than preserving something that cannot be replaced.

What makes it worse is that these kinds of decisions do not just affect us. They take something away from people who are not even here yet. Our kids should be able to experience the Boundary Waters the same way people do now. They should get the chance to see clear water, quiet lakes and real wilderness, not something that has been altered or damaged because we decided to push the limits.

At CSB+SJU, we talk a lot about Benedictine Values such as stewardship, community and respect for the environment. Those are not just ideas we bring up in class; they are supposed to guide decisions. Approving mining near the Boundary Waters does not reflect those values. It feels like we are choosing convenience over responsibility.

The Boundary Waters are not just another resource to be used. They are something that should be protected. Once they are damaged, there is no getting them back the way they were. That is what makes this decision so concerning. It is not just about mining—it is about what we are willing to risk, and whether we are thinking beyond the present moment.

Being an advocate for the preservation of the Boundary Waters is something we should all be taking an initiative in, considering this issue affects us collectively. Making deliberate actions to support the protection of the Boundary Waters is the main objective, and as students, we have the chance to make a lasting impact.

Use this link to support the cause in protecting our Boundary Waters. https://www.savetheboundarywaters.org/